Who Checks The National Assembly?
By Ayantunji Benjamin Gbenro
The National Assembly is rightly referred to as the symbol of our democracy. This is so because it is the only arm of government usually sacked whenever the military takes over. Hence, the absence of the legislative arm is tantamount to the absence of democracy.
Since the inception of our current democratic experiment, the National Assembly has progressively pushed for its independence from the executive arm. The 8th National Assembly has taken the quest for independence to another level through the emergence of its leadership and its activities since inauguration.
The 8th National Assembly has also been throwing its weight around in its oversight function over the Executive, that one is sometimes tempted to think the National Assembly is the official opposition party.
The 8th National Assembly should be given kudos for trying to keep the executive in check. Through most of its braggadocio, we now know things that have in the past been shrouded in secrecy.
The question that however needs an urgent answer is: Who will check the National Assembly?
The 8th National Assembly has always taken Nigerians for granted while threatening the Executive with impeachment whenever there is a disagreement between the two arms. Please recall how the Senate is always on lock down whenever the Senate President appears at the Code of Conduct Tribunal to answer to a personal case bordering on false declaration of assets. This was only stopped due to the hue and cry of Nigerians, who questioned why a national institution should be turned into an armor to fight personal battles. The threat from the Senate as a result of this case and the drama witnessed during the passage of the 2016 appropriation bill is still fresh in our memory.
Should a national institution be turned to a personal estate? Are the senators elected to defend an individual or to serve Nigerians? If the Senate or anybody believes any individual is wrongly accused, the case should be presented in court but not at the expense of legislating for a better Nigeria.
The most recent threat issued by the Senate to the executive borders on the issue of forgery of the Senate standing rules. The Senate through its spokesperson insinuated that the Presidency is trying to jail the principal officers of the National Assembly. The question the Senate fails to address is whether there was forgery of the rule book as alleged or not?
The spokesperson of the Senate agreed that they were just Senators elect before they were sworn- in and that the rules for the inauguration should have been as handed over by the 7th Senate. Some principal officers of the 7th Senate have publicly declared that the rule book used for the inauguration of the 8th Senate was not the same as that used by the 7th Senate and there was no amendment during the 7th Senate. If the rules were changed between the end of the tenure of the 7th and the inauguration of the 8th Senate, who changed it? Shouldn’t the forgery be investigated? Why should such an investigation be interpreted as the Presidency trying to remove the leadership of the Senate? Why should the Senate always threaten the Presidency as if the impeachment clause in the constitution was inserted to settle scores? The fact that a case is investigated does not translate to a declaration of guilt. Nobody should be above the law. The Senate as the principal law making body should not be seen to be breaking the law to satisfy personal whims.
Another affront on the psyche of Nigerians is the recent proposal of immunity and life pension for the principal officers of the National Assembly, during the recently held constitution review retreat. What impunity! Why should members of the National Assembly want life pension and immunity when Nigerians are clamoring for the removal of immunity from the executive arm? This is an affront on the psyche of longsuffering Nigerians.
We watched with awe as they bought exotic cars for themselves despite the economic meltdown. They receive jumbo pay for being on recess for a longer period than they are at work. They spend valuable time debating bills that further their interests while the interest of the common man is neglected. Now they want to be paid for life from our common patrimony and to be protected from prosecution if they commit any criminal offence. I don’t believe our distinguished Senators and Honorable Members would say this. It must have been a misrepresentation of what was proposed.
The local and international media have been awash in the past few days with news of a sex scandal allegedly perpetrated by three honorable members of the House of Representatives in the United States during an international conference. I am not insinuating that the honorable members are guilty, but it’s saner to resign your position if accused of such a grievous act. This is not only about the accused honorable members; it’s about the institution and by extension about Nigeria. The alleged act puts a dent on the image of every Nigerian and should be seen as such. It would however amount to asking for too much from an ordinary member of the National Assembly to be honorable enough to resign based on such allegation. But alas, this is the same institution whose head has cases of corruption hanging on his neck and who still has the audacity not only to preside over the affairs of the National Assembly, but to set up committees to investigate corruption cases.
The national assembly as constituted presently is not and cannot legislate for the good of Nigerians. An assembly of people desperate to hold onto the old order cannot midwife the new Nigeria. Who then will save Nigeria from our legislators?
The answer probably is in the power of the electorate to recall erring legislators. The power lies with the masses to check the National Assembly. If we fail in this task, the country of our dreams may well continue to remain a mirage.
———
Ayantunji Benjamin Gbenro (PhD) tweets from @bengbenro
The post Tunji Gbenro: Who checks the national assembly? appeared first on Ekekeee.